DISQUS

DISQUS Hello! the Jesus Manifesto is using DISQUS, a powerful comment system, to manage its comments. Learn more.

Community Page

  • Subscribe

  • Community

  • Top Commenters

  • Popular Threads

  • Recent Comments

    • Yeah, you don't hear that preached much in church, but that is as central to Christianity as it gets. The gospel Jesus preached was the "Gospel of the Kingdom." He proclaimed that...

      2 hours ago by Zack Allen

      in The Kingdom of God

    • Woa. Something about the way you put that... Gives a whole new understanding (to me, at least) of "the kingdom of god is within you." See, I always kinda thought of the kingdom of God as...

      6 hours ago by Jesse Evans

      in The Kingdom of God

    • Well I was always under the impression that "freedom costs a buck-o-five." Seriously though, I think I like the heart of what you're saying here (we're offered salvation (freedom)...

      6 hours ago by Zack Allen

      in Independence day sort of

    • Yes, I suppose that could describe our experience of it, Jesse. But I'm more interested in the reality of the kingdom that Jesus proclaimed. If it comes slowly to us because we're not...

      18 hours ago by paul munn

      in The Kingdom of God

    • I see what you're saying Paul. As another possible perspective, it could be one of those things that just "creep up on you." Like, all the signs are there but you just don't see...

      1 day ago by Jesse Evans

      in The Kingdom of God

the Jesus Manifesto

following the way of Jesus in the land of our captivity
Jump to original thread »
Author

Going Public with My Privates (part 2 of 3)

Started by markvans · 11 months ago

…on becoming post-(whatever I was).

Last time I was talking about how Evangelicals are free to whip out their private beliefs at any time.  But this individualism left me disillusioned with public individualism.

Evangelical Liberalism

So I, like many others, went searching for a faith that was not only public, but communal. And for many of my friends, [...] ... Continue reading »

2 comments

  • I am re-reading this post and re-reading it.
    Are you making the case that taking faith public, or better, taking faith political, is wrong?
    Both the Wallis crowd and the NAEers are equally out of line in this sense. The argument runs parallel to that of Libertarianism.
    Yet, we continue to desire community. But we treat the church as if it were not enough. Like the man who will not be satisfied with his wife but must run about with mistresses, we desire connections with other people. We are merely promiscuous.
  • jurisnaturalist,
    not so much that 'taking faith public' is wrong, but that it is exactly the wrong way of thinking about it. Rather, faith is always public, never needing to be "made public". This already being public is the community of faith, as I will argue in my last installment.

Add New Comment

Returning? Login