<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Jesus Manifesto - Latest Comments in Movie Review: Religulous</title><link>http://jesusmanifesto.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://jesusmanifesto.disqus.com/movie_review_religulous/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 01:44:43 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Movie Review: Religulous</title><link>http://www.jesusmanifesto.com/2008/10/09/movie-review-religulous/#comment-3786644</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Maher’s main problem isn’t so much with belief or the person of Jesus, but with fallen believers who choose to follow what he believes is a fairytale instead of actually making the world a better place. He’s also on the offense against absolute certainty&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Artificial</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 01:44:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Movie Review: Religulous</title><link>http://www.jesusmanifesto.com/2008/10/09/movie-review-religulous/#comment-2994067</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't have the money to see any movies, sorry to say, but if I did and had to choose between Religulous and &lt;a href="http://www.theordinaryradicals.com/blog/trailer" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.theordinaryradicals.com/blog/trailer"&gt;The Ordinary Radicals&lt;/a&gt; I'd certainly go for the latter. Religulous sounds too much like cheap entertainment to me -- empty calories -- where Jamie Moffett's movie is (as far as I can tell) food for thought ...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 22:44:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Movie Review: Religulous</title><link>http://www.jesusmanifesto.com/2008/10/09/movie-review-religulous/#comment-2979924</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Whoops ... here's the link to the &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/theraptureright" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.youtube.com/user/theraptureright"&gt;RR video&lt;/a&gt;, and here's the link to the &lt;a href="http://www.christianitytoday.com/movies/news/blog-081006.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.christianitytoday.com/movies/news/blog-081006.html"&gt;CT coverage&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">smh00a</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:45:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Movie Review: Religulous</title><link>http://www.jesusmanifesto.com/2008/10/09/movie-review-religulous/#comment-2979872</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So, Christianity Today is reporting today that individuals connected with the movie's production were behind a boycott plea video by a "Christian rock band," lovingly called "Rapture Right." =)  The stunt was apparently to generate more interest in the film and get people to go see it.  Interesting how the traditional Evangelical boycott, to which I refer in this review, is now being turned on its head and used by the other team.  Guess it's one more clue into how silly we look sometimes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Has anyone else out there seen Religulous?  What are your thoughts?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve Holt</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:42:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Movie Review: Religulous</title><link>http://www.jesusmanifesto.com/2008/10/09/movie-review-religulous/#comment-2971586</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Jim...the article was written by Steve Holt. For some reason, it gave my author bio originally, but is now fixed.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">markvans</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 19:14:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Movie Review: Religulous</title><link>http://www.jesusmanifesto.com/2008/10/09/movie-review-religulous/#comment-2971502</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm convinced.  I'm definately going to see this movie.  It sounds like a good laugh, and I've always enjoyed a good poke at man-made religion.  I'm sure it will be almost painful to watch the foolish "Christians" spout off nonsense and give the rest of us a bad name, but in the end the truth will stand.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I hadn't heard of this film until today when I read an article in the newspaper condemning the film for lampooning the faithful.  I was surprised from your article, Mark, that Bill does actually end the film on a positive note.   &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jim</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 19:08:01 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>