<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Jesus Manifesto - Latest Comments in ReJesus: Revisioning Christology?</title><link>http://jesusmanifesto.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://jesusmanifesto.disqus.com/rejesus_revisioning_christology/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 21:08:46 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: ReJesus: Revisioning Christology?</title><link>http://www.jesusmanifesto.com/2008/12/04/rejesus-revisioning-christology/#comment-4279315</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There are comments from Alan Hirsch and Len at:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://nextreformation.com/?p=2472" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://nextreformation.com/?p=2472"&gt;http://nextreformation.com/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andy Rowell</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 21:08:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ReJesus: Revisioning Christology?</title><link>http://www.jesusmanifesto.com/2008/12/04/rejesus-revisioning-christology/#comment-4228939</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I completely empathize with the attitude of "even a problem book is good if it gets you to think", and think it does. It's the books that shunt the thinking process that one need be most wary of.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'll have to say though, as my current stack is getting dangerously high, I'll probably just leave it at the review here. Thank you - I'd honestly never heard some of the concepts presented above, and reading your article was quite the learning experience.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">hewhocutsdown</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 18:53:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ReJesus: Revisioning Christology?</title><link>http://www.jesusmanifesto.com/2008/12/04/rejesus-revisioning-christology/#comment-4226190</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Actually, in terms of influence there is one piece I can point to. Alan is a Messianic Jew. I think that gives him some breadth and depth and perspective that can be very helpful, particularly seeing the impact of dualism on our theology and practice.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">len</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 14:27:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ReJesus: Revisioning Christology?</title><link>http://www.jesusmanifesto.com/2008/12/04/rejesus-revisioning-christology/#comment-4226176</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hmm.. I can't say I know their "credentials" if you mean what schools each have attended. I remember Alan talking about beginning a doctorate at Fuller.. not sure if he ever did so. The books and authors they quote are more or less the books and authors I quote myself.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">len</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 14:25:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ReJesus: Revisioning Christology?</title><link>http://www.jesusmanifesto.com/2008/12/04/rejesus-revisioning-christology/#comment-4223124</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Do you know anything about their theological credentials?  Or even who they quote theologically a lot--their theological influences?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Curious</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 10:35:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ReJesus: Revisioning Christology?</title><link>http://www.jesusmanifesto.com/2008/12/04/rejesus-revisioning-christology/#comment-4208618</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Fantastic article.  Great points on widening a christological focus to make it fully trinitarian.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toddh</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 14:50:40 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>