Hello! the Jesus Manifesto is using DISQUS, a powerful comment system, to manage its comments. Learn more.
Community Page
- www.jesusmanifesto.com/ Jump to website »
-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Recent Comments
- Yeah, you don't hear that preached much in church, but that is as central to Christianity as it gets. The gospel Jesus preached was the "Gospel of the Kingdom." He proclaimed that...
- Woa. Something about the way you put that... Gives a whole new understanding (to me, at least) of "the kingdom of god is within you." See, I always kinda thought of the kingdom of God as...
- Well I was always under the impression that "freedom costs a buck-o-five." Seriously though, I think I like the heart of what you're saying here (we're offered salvation (freedom)...
- Yes, I suppose that could describe our experience of it, Jesse. But I'm more interested in the reality of the kingdom that Jesus proclaimed. If it comes slowly to us because we're not...
- I see what you're saying Paul. As another possible perspective, it could be one of those things that just "creep up on you." Like, all the signs are there but you just don't see...
the Jesus Manifesto
following the way of Jesus in the land of our captivity
I recently came across a rather unfunny piece by someone named Diogenes on Catholic World Daily which is meant to mock those who have or would like others to, ask for forgiveness for the sins of our ancestors. A clip from the piece:
“Itâs back in style: the political fash ... Continue reading »
“Itâs back in style: the political fash ... Continue reading »
1 year ago
1 year ago
1 year ago
I mostly agree, but disagree on a key point (or two). I believe that the cross is a witness to the fact that the dividing wall between us and God is broken down, but the words of Jesus as well as other scripture imply to me that the forgiveness of the cross does not relieve us of the duty of seeking forgiveness from each other.
Jesus instructed us that if we realize that our brother has something against us, even while doing our religious duty, we should go resolve it. The entire book of Philemon is a letter trying to reconcile two people who have an unreconciled conflict by appealing to both justice and mercy.
The problem is that there is unreconciled confict in our society. Groups that we are a part of have wronged other groups, and as a group we have rarely sought forgiveness. It's easy for us to seek justice (eg giving people rights that they have been denied, abolishing unjust laws, etc), those things make us the hero, they make us the good guy. Seeking forgiveness is harder, because it makes us feel bad, and forces us to admit that we and/or the group that we are a part of, have been the bad guy.
But the way of Jesus is to admit when we have done wrong, seek forgiveness for it, and go forward and do right by demonstrating our relentless, healing and guilt-free love.
1 year ago
1 year ago
1 year ago
1 year ago
So, it is ok for those affiliated with the Church, to seek forgiveness for acts done by those who claim to belong to the Church in the name of the Church, would that be correct?
Similarly, would it be ok for people who are members of the Australian government apologizing for the acts of those affiliated with the Australian government done in the name of the Australian government?
In a similar vein, if Australians in the past have done wrong in the name of Australia, would it be ok for Australian Christians to apologize for that since they share the identity of Australian? Or are you saying that once someone is a Christian they are no longer Australian?
1 year ago
1 year ago
1 year ago
The sad reality is that, as a white dude living in America, I was born profoundly privileged...even though I grew up in the lower class or at least lower-middle class. My place in the world--and in the Church--is lofty. I live at the pinacle of a great mountain that is made of the bones of the oppressed. Native Americans and African Americans and Latino Americans and others died to give their bones to my mountain.
I was born on this mountain...so in a certain way of thinking, its existence isn't my fault. But I notice that the decedents of those entombed in my mountain are all much worse off than me. When White America was being created on the backs of African, Native, and Latin Americans, it left fewer resources for them to pass onto their children. So when my ancestors sailed across from Europe and were able to cheaply and easily buy farm land to start their towns and farms, there were entire dispossessed and struggling ethnic groups already here who couldn't buy that land--for a variety of reasons.
Not my fault, I suppose. But I live on the mountain. And I can't help but think that it sucks that Natives and African Americans and Latin Americans and others live at the foot of my mountain. And I can't help but think it sucks even more than I am a follower of Jesus Christ, and my brothers and sisters live below.
So what can I do? I can be downwardly mobile. I can live in solidarity. I can be hospitable. I can be generous and place my spiritual kinship about ethnic ties and racial ties and even family ties. I don't do this out of guilt, but because I honestly believe that I can experience more of the Kingdom this way, and experience more of Jesus this way. And I can recognize that the American Empire is a white-washed Nation. Underneath the lime-wash is an ocean of blood and oppression. Not that America is a bad empire as far as Empires go.
1 year ago
1 year ago
1 year ago
As I read the post, one thing became very clear to me, far too many of us cannot draw a separation between the Church and world governments and nations (even when those nations committed atrocities under the guise of being 'Christian' though their fruit spoke otherwise).
On a more personal note, I have seen this issue first hand where an older black couple so hated white people for the sins of the past that they said they could never accept a white orphan child into their home, and somehow when I said that children are not responsible for the evils of the past I became the bad guy. Yet if I followed their logic I would have to hate myself because I am of British and Irish descent (no need to go in to detail about the history there), I am also Swedish, Swiss-German and Polish (the Vikings committed horrible atrocities against much of Europe). Being of European descent primarily, I am also Native American (and I definitely do not have to talk about that history). That being said, my wife is German and Native American primarily, but some of my ancestors were killed in concentration camps in Poland by the Nazis. Is my wife answerable for that sin? Must she confess the sins of the entire German nation of the 1930's to me? (Read Ezekiel 18:20 in contrast to what was cited in the post. Is there a tension related to this issue?)
The point I am making is that where the Church recognizes it has sinned whether in the present or the past, it must confess and repent to God, but no human nation is the Church, and therefore, biblically speaking God has his own way of bringing them to judgment for their sins (read Romans 1-2 for one example).
1 year ago
While I don't disagree with what you are saying, I think it doesn't address part of the problem. The issue for me isn't simply the sins of the past, but the way in which I benefit or are harmed by those sins.
In other words, we can agree that the white baby isn't responsible for the sins of his parents. But being white in America means that he is likely to benefit from the old sin of slavery. A black baby is likely to suffer for that sin.
The issue isn't about repenting for past wrongs, but striving for a future where the such inequities are reinforced by the church. When big affluent white churches spend all their resources on reaching out to affluent whites while the minority churches down town struggle to make ends meet, they don't need to repent for slavery. They need to give up the power that is granted to them by the society built upon slavery.
1 year ago
1 year ago
Redistribution...perhaps, but only in a Christian sense of sharing of resources. Not as a payment for sins. Nor out of self hatred. But out of a desire to live faithfully as the Church.
I'm sorry if I'm misreading you, but I can't help but sense a bite in your last statement, James. There is no need for that.
What do you recommend? Is there a balance between repentance for the sins of the past and dismissal of the unjust state of things?
1 year ago
Tibet Han and Muslim Chinese are being harmed because of their ethnic background, even if they have no particular influence on government policy.
I have found it is easier to forgive when someone apologizes to me, even if the person apologizing really doesn't understand the consequences of their actions. I have also benefited from apologies from people who apologized on behalf of others even though they personally didn't harm me. True forgiveness is difficult and I'll take any help I can get.
1 year ago
I am not sure how to deal with the issues related to the fact that my ancestors immigrated to this country to flee war, economic hardship, etc. Many of the institutions and sinful social structures were already in place by that time and had been abolished or changed long before I was born. I guess the fact that my ancestry is so culturally and ethnically diverse and that I am well aware of the oppression and/or persecution they faced after coming to this country that I can only say, like Jesus did, Father forgive them for they know not what they do.
The root of the problem is that the Church historically and in contemporary culture has relegated its duty to care for the widow and orphan, feed the hungry, clothe the naked, comfort the sick, bandage the persecuted, and call the outcast to his/her inheritance in the Kingdom of God to human governments, which because they are creations of man are sinful fallen social structures (even the best of them) and they usually end up making things worse. I am not sure how to get that genie back in the bottle on any large scale. That is why I think we are witnessing the shift to more incarnational, missional type Christian communities which are modeled after the example of the early church. This is perhaps the best way to begin to address such a big issue: one neighborhood at a time.
So, why I mourn for the sins of the past and pray that God will forgive us for what we have done to others who are also created in the image of God, I try not to develop a messiah complex where I begin to think that somehow I am personally responsible for saving the world from its sin. Jesus already accomplished that and all we can do is point people to Him through our words and our actions, and trust that He has the power to conform people to His image and in doing so these issues should disappear within His community. I think sometimes we just get in the way of the work entrusted to His Spirit, so that we can have a community built in our image that does the things we want it to do and looks the way we want it to look.
1 year ago
Christians like the Bruderhofs and even the Von Trapp family are now considered heroes, but Germans who remained in Germany during the second world war came out of the conflict assuming collective guilt for their passivity and failure to stand against fascism and genocide.
Revelation 18:4 gives us a sobering warning. "Come out of her MY PEOPLE (emphasis mine) so that you will not share in her sins, so that you will not receive any of her plagues; for her sins are piled up to heaven, and God has remembered her crimes." As Christians do we understand this in a spiritual sense only, or should we be looking at this literally?
1 year ago
I had a professor describe the Christians relationship to the world by comparing the world to a pool full of dirty water in which every human being is swimming. Some really enjoy swimming in the water and do not recognize that it is dirty. Others see the water for what it is and want to get out. The point he was making is that none of us remain untouched by sin in this world.
One last point. In all of this discussion I see little reference to Jesus. We have a tendency to only view Jesus' crucifixion as saving the individual from personal sin. God's work of salvation in Jesus means that Jesus conquered sin in all of its forms from the individual who sins to the social structures that are enslaved to sin. However, that final defeat is not a full reality in the world in which we live but I believe a glimpse of it is intended to be seen in the church, which is Christ's community. I think that is the point being made in Rev. 18:4: the church is supposed to exist as a glimpse of the new creation where none of this stuff exists which illuminates the significance of statements like there is no longer Jew nor Greek, male nor female, slave nor free. We are all one in Christ and the sin of the world has no dominion over the Lord's church even though Christians may stumble due to the fact that we still live in the pool.
1 year ago
1 year ago
Really, what we all must do is use our resources to bear witness to the Kingdom. The Rich Young Ruler, for example, wasn't called to burn his resources, but to share them with the poor. We, who have been given much, must use our resources and privileges for the cause of Christ, not for our own purposes.
1 year ago
Now, we Brits are responsible for most of the world's problems as everyone knows. Our colonial exploits set in motion many of the conflicts which still reverberate today, we were closely involved in the slave trade and all that stuff.
Ultimately it can be argued that the basis of our national wealth is our history of raping and pillaging around the planet. Given that I am sitting on a huge pile of cash - to the extent that 90% of the planet's population is poorer than I am - I have benefited from that terrible harvest.
But I cannot offer repentance to those millions who have been affected by the actions of my forefathers - because I am not in a position to put right the wrongs. Just as I have friends stuck within a cycle of poverty which keeps them poor, I am stuck within a cycle of advantage which it is difficult to break out from.
The best I can offer them is an awareness of the collective guilt I carry as a man, a European, a Brit, a white person, a middle class person etc, and to commit myself to their welfare in the future along with a continued battle with the wealth I am saddled with. I appreciate that isn't good enough, but I honestly cannot see how I could repent enough to those affected by my ancestors.
1 year ago
I used WWII Germany as an extreme example, but it is a real example nonetheless. Many groups left Germany in the 1930's (like the Anabaptist Bruderhofs) when they saw the fascist writing on the wall. The storied Von Trapp family left Austria before Captain Von Trapp was forced to report for duty in the German navy. Many good German Christians remained in Germany delivering mail, (to SS officers), running the trains (with human cargo headed to death camps) and growing food (for the advancing German armies). Those who remained after the war assumed the collective guilt of the nation. Even today Germany pays reparations to Israel for crimes committed 70 years ago. Had we lived in Germany in 1938 what would we have done?
It's interesting that the Anabaptists were brought up in an earlier comment. Probably no Christian group has been more prone to "witness with their feet" whenever persecution or conviction called them to "come out".
1 year ago
I tend to think that the Anabaptists were somewhat hasty in their "witness with their feet." When people withdraw from the world in order to be separate from its corruption, they all too often leave the missional impulse behind.
It is amazing how missional Anabaptists can be in places like Congo or Columbia, yet sometimes miss things when it comes to the US.
If we are going to "come out" from Babylon, then we must also, as a next step, embrace a sense of being "sent" to Babylon as Kingdom people. This, it seems to me, is about attitude, practices, and convictions more than it is a change of location.
1 year ago
Maybe the lesson we need to learn is that we are called to carry our cross daily and follow Jesus. He did not flee or come out of his nation or the Roman Empire but instead offered a counter-cultural community and way of life that actually resisted that social structure in a nonviolent manner.
Casey, I pointed out the the church IS the coming out of Babylon spoken of in Revelation. Contrast the statement with the initial letters to the church in order to develop some context for that statement.
1 year ago
As far as context is concerned I tend to view Revelation as a futurist, so much of what happens after Rev 4:1 I would classify in the category of "unfolding events". I do not claim to be a Bible scholar, however.
1 year ago
1 year ago
Well, clearly Rev 18:4 is to be taken in more than a spiritual way in the sense that we have to actually do something about Babylon. But the language isn't literal. It says: "Come out of her" which is poet language referring to Babylon as a woman. And even the use of the word "Babylon" is prophetic poetry.
So, if I read it as "come out of Rome" I suppose I could take it literally...that I should actually leave Rome. The problem is that I don't get any sense from any of the research I've done that any Christians at the time took it as a call to geographically leave the Roman Empire.
If I take it one step further and try to equate Rome with "the USA"--which one can easily do, though not in a 1:1 sense--I could maybe take it as a call to leave the US. But I don't see that in the scripture at all. Throughout all of Revelation (and throughout Paul's writings) I get the sense that our "coming out of Babylon" is indeed a relocation: a relocation to the Kingdom of God.
In other words, coming out of Babylon involves living as Kingdom citizens. Not participating in pagan worship, pagan economics, pagan values. As USAmericans we have to do a bit of imaginative work to figure out what that means (which is what Jesus Manifesto is all about). Jesus Manifesto is, in a sense, an exploration of just that: what does it really mean to "leave Babylon?"
I say this as a partial preterist (meaning that I don't think Revelation has very much to do with future events. Most of the scholars that I trust who understand early Christian origins and history and literature tend to see it the same way.
The church in every age has had to explore what it means to leave Babylon. Could that, in some way, mean leaving the country you live in? Sure, but I don't think that is what is being talked about here. And it seems to me that the best way we can "come out" of Babylon is to nonviolently resist her, rather than relocating.
This is filtered through my opinion that the big Empire we need to struggle against in our day isn't the USA, but the entangled mess of governments, business, consumer-forces, and individualist values. And for Chinese Christians the Empire is something different. And for Christians in Pakistan it is something different.
1 year ago
So, do we symbolically come out of Babylon? Yes, absolutely. Should we engage in worldly practices? Clearly no. We need to live as citizens of God's Kingdom in the here and now.
Nevertheless, Scripture gives us a number of examples of people called out of a place (Abraham from Ur, Lot from Sodom, the Israelites from Egypt). Even Jesus tells us that there will be times when we will have to physically leave a place unresponsive to the Gospel and shake the dust off our feet. He also warns that the judgment for such a place will be harsh. (Matt 10:14).
I'm not saying here that we must now leave Minnesota (den of iniquity that it is), or that Christians need to get our of New York or Las Vegas. My point is that we need to listen to what the Holy Spirit says and if He says "shake the dust off your feet and go" then we need to go. Certainly Jesus' warning in Luke 21:20-24 echoes this idea.
1 year ago
Just like I don't believe that even the most literalist views of the "kingdom of God" are referring to a place.
I agree that we must shake the dust off of our feet at some point. I'm just not sure when that is. The early church, almost universally, had such a strongly developed belief in witnessing to the point of death. So, in my mind, as long as there are some who are receptive I believe we are called to stay put. Even if the majority of a place wants us dead. That seems to be the New Testament witness on this.
So, to use the Las Vegas analogy, even if 95% of the city is against God, we would stay for the 5%. Or the 1%. And only move on if no one will take us in.
1 year ago
1 year ago
Both the harlot riding the beast and Babylon, then, are descriptions of Jerusalem, and these chapters are about the city's coming destruction. They closely parallel Jesus' own prophecy of this event, especially with the references to the blood of the prophets and martyrs in 17:6 and 18:24 being found in her. (The OT also contains prophetic words identifying unfaithful Israel as an adulterer.) The beast is Rome, which the unbelieving Jews "rode" to aid them in their persecution of Christians. Incidentally, every last Christian had fled Jerusalem as Jesus had warned well before the siege. There is a great study on this by David Chilton called "Paradise Restored", and though there is some unsavory theonomist stuff in there, he explains the book in a way that makes far more sense to me than anything I've ever heard. It's been a long time though, so I might think differently if I read it again, I don't know.
I like the way N T Wright explains the apocalyptic phenomenon as investing the political events of the time with their full theological significance. There are other Jewish writings of the first century that fall in this category as well. One is Enoch 4 (I think) which is a retelling of Daniel's vision of the four beasts, only this time the fourth beast is an eagle, a clear reference to Rome.
How is all this relevant to this discussion? Well, if we read these earthly events as a sign that the Son of Man reigns from heaven, we are going to have a really optimistic hope for the Kingdom. We also inherit a language for identifying modern "beasts" and a criteria for judging the course of history.
The "coming out" theme, I think, in St. John's Hebraic mind, echoes of the Exodus. God is forming a new people that would not share in the plagues (or deeds) of her oppressors. If this is our story too, then it says a lot about how we identify ourselves in the midst of modern empires. And if I do identify myself with Jesus and the martyrs where is it showing?
1 year ago
I would like to touch again on the subject of WWII Germany. The fact is that Germans who remained in Germany thru the war and survived its devastation have been held collectively guilty by the rest of the world. That is why today Germans are still paying reparations to Israel and will be for a long time to come. What can we learn from this?
The case of Bonhoeffer, I believe, actually illustrates the potential dangers of physically staying in any system that is manifestly evil (be it the Mafia, Sodom or end-times Babylon). All systems are worldly, however, there may be a time when, in order to protect our spiritual integrity, we have to leave a place. This I think is one of the lessons of of Matt 10:14. Bonhoeffer returned, saw the evil that Hitler was causing Germany and Europe and determined the only "solution" was to ally himself with violent conspirators. As Shane Claiborn has correctly pointed out, the failure of the assassination attempt actually may have prolonged the war; Hitler survived the attempted assassination with even more sense of divine mission. After Bonhoeffer returned to Germany he was faced with an excruciating moral dilemma. Now Bonhoeffer was a great man; if he could succumb to the very systemic violence he opposed would we fare any better? Sometimes prudence is the better part of valor.
1 year ago
It sucks that faithful Germans are held guilty by the rest of the world. Though I think most people are more nuanced than that. But I'm not sure what difference it makes. God knows the difference. And I suppose that the decedents of Shindler and Christian non-violent resisters and other saints are lumped in too...does that mean that it would have been better if they had left? I don't think so at all.
Part of the sticky wicket with today's "empire" is that we can't extricate ourselves through relocation. Ours is an empire of global consumer capitalism that has little to do with location. It is like the speech given by the evil CEO in the movie Network. He asserts that there are no more nations...only money. Not precisely true, but it gets at a truth that the rich and powerful are connected throughout this world. Extricating myself from Empire means a whole lot more than relocation in a world where Empire is so portable.
Back to Nazi Germany. I don't believe that it ever got so bad as to require leaving the place. That isn't to say that it wasn't a cesspool of horrible evil. But it is to say that there were always faithful still there. And, to be biblical about it, one of the more common ways of leaving an evil system is by dying at its hands (like Jesus and almost all of the Apostles).
1 year ago
"I don't believe that it ever got so bad as to require leaving the place."
That statement came out completely wrong. Let me clarify:
It got bad enough…meaning unsafe enough…to certainly justify fleeing.
But it didn’t get bad enough…in the Sodom and Gomorrah sense of there being no righteous left…to indicate that the just should shake the dust off and leave. That was the point I was trying to make.
It seems as though these two things are getting mixed together (the idea of personal safety and the idea of withdrawing witness) in a way that is never presented in Scripture. Scripture, actually links death and witness in an almost positive way. It never seems to indicate that lack of safety is a justification for withdrawing witness.
Perhaps a distinction could be helpful. Instead of simply asking the question: "When is it bad enough for me and my family to leave?" We should also ask: "When is it bad enough for the Church to turn its back on a nation?" Those aren't always the same question. This is a very nuanced issue.
I hope I’m making a clear point. And again, we’re talking about this in a very abstract logical sense. When it comes down to the messiness of situations like this, it isn’t nearly so clean.